Decorative spacer for background

APL-UW Home

University of Washington W Logo

Jobs
About
Campus Map
Contact
Privacy
YouTube
Facebook
Intranet

Barbrina Dunmire

Senior Engineer

Email

mrbean@uw.edu

Phone

206-685-6953

Education

B.S. Aeronautics & Astronautics, University of Washington, 1989

M.S. Aeronautics & Astronautics, University of Washington, 1991

M.S. Bioengineering, University of Washington, 1998

Publications

2000-present and while at APL-UW

Fragmentation and facilitated clearance of small, asymptomatic, renal stones with burst wave lithotripsy and ultrasonic propulsion: A 14-month follow-up

Harper, J.D., B. Dunmire, J. Thiel, B.H. Burke, A.C. Desai, M. Dighe, B.J. Levchak, J.E. Lingeman, C.C.Yang, M.R. Bailey, Z. Liu, and M.D. Sorensen, "Fragmentation and facilitated clearance of small, asymptomatic, renal stones with burst wave lithotripsy and ultrasonic propulsion: A 14-month follow-up," J. Endourol., EOR, doi:10.1177/08927790261472744, 2026.

More Info

2 Aug 2026

Purpose:
To evaluate if treating small asymptomatic renal stones with office-based burst wave lithotripsy (BWL) and ultrasonic propulsion (UP) prevents future stone growth, emergency department visits, and surgical procedures for stone care.

Methods:
Participants with 2–7 mm asymptomatic renal stones were treated with BWL to break stones and UP to facilitate clearance of fragments. The primary outcome measure was relapse, defined as stone growth, an urgent or emergent medical visit, or operation for the randomized stones of interest within 14 months of the procedure. These events would include visits caused by the treatment and the presence of residual stones. Relapse data from untreated control groups with small stones or fragments from three published contemporaneous studies with similar protocols and 1- to 5-year follow-up were pooled and inverse probability weighted for comparison. The cumulative incidence of relapse was estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method.

Results:
Between April 2023 and September 2024, 18 participants underwent treatment of 27 asymptomatic small stones; 7 (39%) participants underwent a second BWL procedure to complete treatment. The control group had significantly shorter time to relapse than the treatment group (p = 0.048 by weighted log-rank test). The hazard ratio for relapse in the treatment group, compared with the control group, was less than 0.01 (p < 0.001). There was no relapse in the treated group within 14 months. For comparison, the 1-year relapse rate was 26% in the control group.

Conclusions:
In a small feasibility study, no stone-related relapse events occurred within 14 months following treatment of small, asymptomatic renal stones with BWL and UP.

Facilitated clearance of small, asymptomatic renal stones with burst wave lithotripsy and ultrasonic propulsion

Harper, J.D., and 18 others including B. Dunmire, J. Thiel, Y.-N. Wang, S. Totten, J.C. Kucewicz, and M.R. Bailey, "Facilitated clearance of small, asymptomatic renal stones with burst wave lithotripsy and ultrasonic propulsion," J. Urol., 214, 41-47, doi:10.1097/JU.0000000000004533, 2025.

More Info

1 Jul 2025

We tested feasibility of burst wave lithotripsy (BWL) and ultrasonic propulsion to noninvasively fragment and expel small, asymptomatic renal stones in awake participants.

Adult patients suspected of having 2- to 7-mm stones were consented and screened for eligibility. BWL and ultrasonic propulsion were applied to up to 3 stones in 1 kidney of qualifying participants for a 30-minute total exposure. Participants completed a CT scan and the Wisconsin Stone Quality-of-Life (WISQOL) questionnaire within 90 days before and 120 days after the procedure. Participants were contacted weekly for 3 weeks after the procedure to assess adverse events (AEs). Outcomes included (1) no fragment > 2 mm, (2) unanticipated health care visits, (3) change in stone volume, (4) reported AEs, and (5) WISQOL score.

Forty-one participants were enrolled between April 2023 and October 2024. Twenty-one participants failed screening because no stones were seen, stones were too large or small, stone visibility was too deep or obstructed, or they declined to participate. Twenty participants with 31 stones received the research procedure with 7 undergoing a single repeat procedure. Twenty-two of 31 stones (71%) met the primary effectiveness outcome of no fragment > 2 mm, with 17 of 31 stones (55%) reported as stone free. Median stone volume reduction (IQR) was 100% (88%–100%). No participants returned unexpectedly for care related to the procedure. AEs were all Grade I by modified Clavien classification. WISQOL scores improved on 10 of 15 completed questionnaires.

Small, asymptomatic renal stones were effectively and safely removed in awake participants in a clinic setting.

Randomized controlled trial of ultrasonic propulsion-facilitated clearance of residual kidney stone fragments vs. observation

Sorensen, M.D., and 16 others including B. Dunmire, J. Thiel, B.W. Cunitz, J.C. Kucewicz, and M.R. Bailey, "Randomized controlled trial of ultrasonic propulsion-facilitated clearance of residual kidney stone fragments vs. observation," J. Urol., 212, 811-820, doi:10.1097/JU.0000000000004186, 2024.

More Info

1 Dec 2024

Ultrasonic propulsion is an investigational procedure for awake patients. Our purpose was to evaluate whether ultrasonic propulsion to facilitate residual kidney stone fragment clearance reduced relapse.

This multicenter, prospective, open-label, randomized, controlled trial used single block randomization (1:1) without masking. Adults with residual fragments (individually 5 mm or smaller) were enrolled. Primary outcome was relapse as measured by stone growth, a stone-related urgent medical visit, or surgery by 5 years or study end. Secondary outcomes were fragment passage within 3 weeks and adverse events within 90 days. Cumulative incidence of relapse was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Log-rank test was used to compare the treatment (ultrasonic propulsion) and control (observation) groups.

The trial was conducted from May 9, 2015, through April 6, 2024. Median follow-up (interquartile range) was 3.0 (1.8–3.2) years. The treatment group (n = 40) had longer time to relapse than the control group (n = 42; P < .003). The restricted mean time-to-relapse was 52% longer in the treatment group than in the control group (1530 ± 92 days vs 1009 ± 118 days), and the risk of relapse was lower (hazard ratio 0.30, 95% CI 0.13–0.68) with 8 of 40 and 21 of 42 participants, respectively, experiencing relapse. Omitting 3 participants not asked about passage, 24 treatment (63%) and 2 control (5%) participants passed fragments within 3 weeks of treatment. Adverse events were mild, transient, and self-resolving, and were reported in 25 treated participants (63%) and 17 controls (40%).

More Publications

Inventions

Broadly Focused Ultrasonic Propulsion Probes, Systems, and Methods

Disclosed herein are ultrasonic probes and systems incorporating the probes. The probes are configured to produce an ultrasonic therapy exposure that, when applied to a kidney stone, will exert an acoustic radiation force sufficient to produce ultrasonic propulsion. Unlike previous probes configured to produce ultrasonic propulsion, however, the disclosed probes are engineered to produce a relatively large (both wide and long) therapy region effective to produce ultrasonic propulsion. This large therapy region allows the probe to move a plurality of kidney stones (or fragments from lithotripsy) in parallel, thereby providing the user the ability to clear several stones from an area simultaneously. This "broadly focused" probe is, in certain embodiments, combined in a single handheld unit with a typical ultrasound imaging probe to produce real-time imaging. Methods of using the probes and systems to move kidney stones are also provided.

Patent Number: 10,667,831

Mike Bailey, Bryan Cunitz, Barbrina Dunmire, Adam Maxwell, Oren Levy

Patent

2 Jun 2020

Ultrasound Based Method and Apparatus for Stone Detection and to Facilitate Clearance Thereof

Patent Number: 10,039,562

Mike Bailey, Bryan Cunitz, Barbrina Dunmire

More Info

Patent

7 Aug 2018

Described herein are methods and apparatus for detecting stones by ultrasound, in which the ultrasound reflections from a stone are preferentially selected and accentuated relative to the ultrasound reflections from blood or tissue. Also described herein are methods and apparatus for applying pushing ultrasound to in vivo stones or other objects, to facilitate the removal of such in vivo objects.

Ultrasound Based Method and Apparatus for Stone Detection and to Facilitate Clearance Thereof

Patent Number: 9,597,103

Mike Bailey, John Kucewicz, Barbrina Dunmire, Neil Owen, Bryan Cunitz

More Info

Patent

21 Mar 2017

Described herein are methods and apparatus for detecting stones by ultrasound, in which the ultrasound reflections from a stone are preferentially selected and accentuated relative to the ultrasound reflections from blood or tissue. Also described herein are methods and apparatus for applying pushing ultrasound to in vivo stones or other objects, to facilitate the removal of such in vivo objects.

More Inventions

Acoustics Air-Sea Interaction & Remote Sensing Center for Industrial & Medical Ultrasound Electronic & Photonic Systems Environmental & Information Systems Ocean Engineering Ocean Physics Polar Science Center
Close

 

Close