APL-UW Home

Jobs
About
Campus Map
Contact
Privacy
Intranet

Kyla Drushka

Principal Oceanographer

Affiliate Assistant Professor, Oceanography

Email

kdrushka@apl.washington.edu

Phone

206-543-6858

Research Interests

Observational Oceanography, Tropical Air-Sea Interaction, Submesoscale to Mesoscale Physics of the Upper Ocean, Ocean Salinity Variability, Satellite Measurements, Rain Impacts on the Ocean

Department Affiliation

Ocean Physics

Education

B.S. Physics, McGill University, 2004

Ph.D. Physical Oceanography, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, 2011

Publications

2000-present and while at APL-UW

Classification of sea-ice concentration from ship-board S-band radar images using open-source machine learning tools

Westbrook, E., P. Gaube, E. Culhane, F. Bingham, A. Pacini, C. Schmidgall, J. Schanze, and K. Drushka, "Classification of sea-ice concentration from ship-board S-band radar images using open-source machine learning tools," Geosci. Instrum. Methods Data Syst., 15, 53-63, doi:10.5194/gi-15-53-2026, 2026

More Info

9 Feb 2026

To gain context on the ambient sea ice field during the 2022 NASA Salinity and Stratification at the Sea Ice Edge (SASSIE) expedition we developed a machine learning model to predict sea ice cover classification from screen captures of a ship-board S-band navigation radar. The SASSIE expedition measured ocean surface properties and air-sea exchange approximately 400 km north of Alaska in the Beaufort Sea for 20 d, during which time screen captures from the shipboard S-band radar were collected. Our goal was to analyze these images to determine when the ship was approaching sea ice, in the ice, or in open water. Here we report on the development of a machine learning method built on the PyTorch software packages to classify the amount of sea ice observed in individual radar images on a scale from C0-C3. C0 indicates open water and C3 is assigned to images taken when the ship was navigating through thick sea ice in the marginal ice zone. The method described here is directly applicable to any radar images of sea ice and allows for the classification and validation of sea ice presence or absence. Furthermore, this method uses a standard marine navigation radar that is not generally used to measure sea ice and thus opens the opportunity to categorize sea ice concentration using the type of navigation radar installed on most vessels.

Global distribution and governing dynamics of submesoscale density fronts

Whalen, C.B., and K. Drushka, "Global distribution and governing dynamics of submesoscale density fronts," J. Phys. Oceanogr., 55, 1831-1845, doi:10.1175/JPO-D-24-0119.1, 2025.

More Info

1 Oct 2025

While the dynamics at submesoscales (on the order of 0.1–10 km) are thought to be important globally for a range of processes near the air–sea interface, few observational studies sufficiently span scales to include both the submesoscale and global scales, leaving many questions concerning the coupling between the scales unexplored. To address this gap, we use a global dataset of ship-based thermosalinograph and satellite sea surface temperature data to identify over 250 000 submesoscale density fronts throughout the ocean. Globally, we find that the mean submesoscale frontal dynamics can be characterized by a scaling based on the hypothesis that the Rossby number and Froude number are proportional, Ro ∼ Fr. Our results also show that the large-scale ocean characteristics play a role in setting the spatial variability of submesoscale frontal horizontal buoyancy gradients (i.e., frontal "sharpness"). If the large-scale background density gradient is large and/or dominated by salinity as opposed to temperature variability, then submesoscale fronts tend to be sharper. We show that globally, shallow mixed layers are also associated with sharper submesoscale fronts, in contrast to previous regional-scale findings. This global perspective on the variability and dynamics of submesoscale fronts raises many additional questions and, hopefully, will inspire the formation of new scale-spanning avenues for future studies.

Impact of rain-adjusted satellite sea surface salinity on ENSO predictions from the GMAO S2S forecast system

Hackert, E., and 7 others including K. Drushka, "Impact of rain-adjusted satellite sea surface salinity on ENSO predictions from the GMAO S2S forecast system," J. Geophys. Res., 130, doi:10.1029/2024JC021773, 2025.

More Info

9 May 2025

Previous research has shown that assimilating satellite sea surface salinity (SSS) has improved initialization of coupled El Niño/Southern Oscillation (ENSO) forecasts. However, most of these assimilation techniques have either removed the freshwater bias by correcting to monthly mean fields of subsurface observations or ignored it altogether. In this paper, we explore the impact of accounting for the satellite SSS fresh bias by first estimating, then removing the near-surface salinity gradient from the satellite SSS using the Rain Impact Model (RIM [Santos-Garcia et al., 2014). This diffusivity model is calculated using collocated satellite rainfall and SSS estimates. Two ocean reanalyses are produced, one assimilating RIM data, which removes the fresh bias at the surface (SSS_RIM), and the other experiment retains this bias (CONTROL). Both reanalyses additionally assimilate all conventional ocean observations. Comparison of SSS_RIM versus CONTROL shows that the thermocline is deeper for the SSS_RIM, allowing this reanalysis to store more heat. Removing the fresh bias destabilizes the water column for the SSS_RIM experiment, allowing enhanced mixing, and more heat storage. ENSO forecasts initiated from April reanalyses from 2015 to 2021 are consistently warmer for SSS_RIM than for the CONTROL. For all but one instance (2017), these SSS_RIM forecasts are closer to observations than the CONTROL. These results argue that operational coupled forecast centers should reevaluate bias-correcting the satellite SSS using monthly gridded fields of in situ salinity, but rather they should utilize observed rainfall to estimate coincident near surface salinity gradients.

More Publications

Acoustics Air-Sea Interaction & Remote Sensing Center for Industrial & Medical Ultrasound Electronic & Photonic Systems Environmental & Information Systems Ocean Engineering Ocean Physics Polar Science Center
Close

 

Close